PDA

View Full Version : Income Tax Explained



524
09-29-2015, 05:23 PM
INCOME TAX 101
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
comes to R100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it
would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay R1.
The sixth would pay R3.
The seventh would pay R7.
The eighth would pay R12.
The ninth would pay R18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay R59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the
arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are
all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your
daily beer by R20." Drinks for the ten now cost just R80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so
the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But
what about the other six men, the paying customers?
How would they divide the R20 windfall so that everyone would get his
fair share?
They realized that R20 divided by six is R3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man
would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's
bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the
amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid R2 instead of R3 (33% savings).
The seventh now pay R5 instead of R7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid R9 instead of R12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid R14 instead of R18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid R49 instead of R59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before and the first four continued
to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
compare their savings.
"I only got a Rand out of the R20, "declared the sixth man. He pointed
to the tenth man, "but he got R10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a Rand,
too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get R10 back
when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat
down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,
they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money
between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics
University of Georgia
FOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND, NO EXPLANATION IS NEEDED.
FOR THOSE WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND, NO EXPLANATION WOULD EVER BE
POSSIBLE!!

Unregistered
09-29-2015, 06:03 PM
Exactly ! Exactly ! Exactly !

Bye apezania.

Lukas
09-29-2015, 06:30 PM
Anoniem. David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D. Professor of Economics University of Georgia is nie van Suid-Afrika nie en het nie die vergelyking gemaak om die konsep aan Suid-Afrikaners te verduidelik nie. Met ander woorde. Waarheen sal jy dan gaan ? <a href="http://www.sherv.net/"><img alt="Swearing smiley face" width=50 height=40 src="http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/swearing-smiley.gif"></a>

Unregistered
09-29-2015, 09:01 PM
In Apezania the final catch is that the beer gets stolen.........

Lukas
09-30-2015, 10:55 AM
Miskien is Swede beter.

Chris1
09-30-2015, 05:41 PM
HA HA HA Swaer! Swede is M toe en die M staan nie meer lank vir modern nie!

Unregistered
09-30-2015, 07:32 PM
The same breed of Jews / Khazars / Zionists that destroyed a Western country like Sweden (and now doing it to the rest of Europe) also took part in the subtle & systematic destruction of South Africa. Being the despicable pro- Communists and Leftist-liberals that they are, they are also the first & foremost promoters of (inter-racial) “freedom”, “equality”, “brotherhood”, “reconciliation”, “accommodation”, race mixing and forced integration. They skilfully integrated the Africans into Sweden. This is why Sweden = Apezania. Both these countries are infested, infected and polluted with ‘dark matter’. Even the tiniest amount of (black / brown) excrement will degrade and destroy a vast amount of vanilla ice cream. Their filthy agenda is to pollute and destroy Western (Christian) civilization.

524
09-30-2015, 09:14 PM
Their filthy agenda is to pollute and destroy Western (Christian) civilization.

Watch this and listen to what Rabbi Abe Finklestein has to say about their agenda - why would he lie?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdlke3QXMgM&feature=youtu.be

Lukas
10-01-2015, 12:19 AM
Dit was baie interessant en ek sal verseker so bietjie huiswerk oor hierdie onderwerp moet doen

Unregistered
10-01-2015, 03:43 PM
Who is behind multi-culturalism, race mixing and forced integration.....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ9n0hibSS4

Unregistered
10-01-2015, 08:18 PM
The only noticable mistake in this following article, is their perception or view of the (super rich) Roman Catholic Church [who's vast finances are controlled by the Rothschilds themselves].

The rest of the information on this following informative page seems to be quite acurate....


http://politicalvelcraft.org/2015/09/30/rothschilds-zionist-design-of-israel-religion-into-a-state/


Enjoy

Lukas
10-02-2015, 10:24 AM
524. EK is op hierdie stadium nog nie seker of ek die plasing van Finkelstine moet uitvee nie. Op hierdie stadium lyk dit vir my of die hele program dalk nie baie akkuraat kan wees nie. Dit is Xander sê. Jy kan nie n ding wat jy gesien het, ont sien nie. Of n ding wat jy gehoor het, ont hoor nie. Vir die rede kan ek dit nie afvee nie, ons sal dit wat verkeerd is, verkeerd moet bewys.

Ek wag wag vir n analis se uiteensetting van gebeure wat op hierdie stadium vir my met vorige inligting klop en wanneer hy klaar geskryf het, sal ek dit hier plaas.

Maar intussen het ek op n interessante dokumentêr oor propaganda afgekom en ek wonder of ons nie van daardie beginsels moet gebruik om AKSKA te bevorder nie.

Hou in gedagte dat hierdie program deur heidene gemaak is wat ons Vader nie ken nie. Dit grens soms aan Lastering en tog is dit vanuit hulle oogpunt. Probeer maar die balans hou en kyk hoe Goddelose mense in die Naam van Ons Vader, bevolkings manipuleer. anda program en is baie, baie slim gedoen

Hierdie hele program oor propaganda is self propaganda en dit is baie, baie goed gedoen, en jy kan baie daaruit leer.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUu7DhL86Js

caholt
10-02-2015, 10:36 AM
Lukas,

Daai video is maar soos enige video wat n mens op die internet kry.
Jy moet uitfigure watse informasie wat gegee word is bruikbaar en wat nie, met dit gese was daar n paar interesanthede in daai video as n mens Finkelstein ignoreer.

caholt.

524
10-02-2015, 11:34 AM
Dit bly maar 'n deurmekaar ou wereld wat ons in lewe. Propaganda is "Public Relations" en Terrorist is "Freedom Fighter" - Dit hang seker of van waaraf jy na die inhoud van iets kyk, daar is dan tog mense wat glo jy kry 'n etiese prokerower!

Wat sou Finklestein se eintlike agenda wees met sy gespog? Hulle sê dat elke leun 'n bietjie waarheid in hom het. Daar is vandag so baie "political posturing" en fals vlae om 'n agenda te bereik dat waarheid moeilik van fiksie onderskei kan word.

524
10-02-2015, 06:53 PM
Hier is nou 'n ander "angle" - wie is nou eintlik die goeie ouens en wie is die "baddies"?
.

Published on Sep 30, 2015
Yesterday, Loretta Lynch announced before the United Nations that the Attorney General's Office, in collaboration with several US Cities will for a global law enforcement initiative called the Strong Cities Network. This is the implementation of UN rules and laws on US soil bypassing Congress and circumventing the Constitution.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhuhHK2LAYg&feature=youtu.be

Lukas
10-02-2015, 08:25 PM
Caholt. Die Noord-Koreaanse propaganda film was vir my nogal baie insiggewend. Dit het baie goed verduidelik waaroor ons wonder en hulle het baie navorsing gedoen om die Weste te verstaan, en toe dit afsluit, trap hulle in presies dieselfde gat as wat die res van die wêreld trap, voor hulle droogmaak.

Dit kom daarop neer dat die mens eerder antwoorde soek as om dit self uit te dink. Die mens word gevaarlik wanneer hy homself superieur bo ander sien en regerings word gevaarlik, wanneer hulle retoriek aandui dat hulle namens die mens besluite kan neem wat van die mens n beter skepsel kan maak.

Wanneer ons Finkelstine uit die vorige video haal, is die program eintlik interessant, maar ons sal eers so bietjie beter na die Bybel moet kyk as ons dit wil glo.

Neem byvoorbeeld die Israeliete se terugkeer na Israel. Hierdie ouens sê dat dit nie God is wat hulle teruggebring het nie maar die Rothschild’s. Wel, oor die Rothschild’s is hulle reg, maar kan hulle sê dat dit nie God se wil is nie? Probeer hulle vir ons vertel dat God dit nooit goedgekeur het nie? As dit die geval is, wonder ek of God hulle regtig ken.

Ek glo nie. Lees ons Esegiël 37 van vers 16 tot 21, dan verstaan jy waarom die Jood nie meer weet van watter stam hy is nie. Hy sal nie, want God het dit een gemaak
Lees jy Esegiël 39 . Die Gog as ek dit reg verstaan, is Sjina en Sjina gaan is so groot menigte soos vlieë in Israel vrek dat dit sewe maande sal neem om hulle te begrawe.
Vers 15 vertel dalk vir ons dat die wat dood sal wees, op een of ander manier toksies sal wees want enige een sal nie sommer n been kan begrawe nie. Wanneer hy n been sien, sal hy dit soos n landmyn merk sodat die begrawers dit kan kom begrawe.

Dit wat in Esegiël verduidelik word, het nog nie gebeur nie en dit lyk of ons nou daardie tyd nader.

Wanneer ek hierna kyk, klink dit vir my of die Finkelstine waarvan hulle praat, of nie hy was nie of moontlik gesuip of gerook was toe hulle met hom gepraat het. Hulle sal ook nie kan sê dat dit nie God was wat hulle laat terugkeer het nie. As dit teen God se wil was, waarom sal Hy hulle dan volgens die profesieë van Esegiël laat terugkom en hulle in hulle land seën?

Ja, die Rothschild’s was n sleutel figuur in die herstel van Israel, net soos wat die Farao n sleutel figuur in die uittrek uit Egipte was en net soos wat Nebukadnesar n sleutel figuur was om in n vreemde land, eer aan die God van Daniel te gee.

Nee, dit was nie die Rothschild’s nie. God lei die gedagtes van konings soos water in n leivoor. Dit is al.

524
10-02-2015, 09:59 PM
Die is ook maar 'n ander klomp! Hulle mag die spot dryf maar as jy iets sê is jy onmiddelik "Anti-Semitic"



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RY83mAr5uA&feature=youtu.be

Lukas
10-03-2015, 12:17 AM
Dit maak my hartseer om sulke goed te sien, maar dit staan so geskryf en op n dag sal hulle ogies oopgaan en n groot skok sal hulle tref

caholt
10-03-2015, 04:36 PM
Lukas,
Ek vestaan presies wat jy se dat dit dalk die Rothchilds was wat Israel se nuwe stigting bewerk het maar op die ou einde van die dag is dit deel van God se groter plan.

Oor die algemeen, as ek iets op die internet sien van wat mense dink God se plan is, gaan dit by een oor in en die ander uit.
Ek neem die die ander informasie in soos wie was agter die hele ding ens ens maar ek laat nie toe dat enige iemand wat ek niks ken nie vir my se wat God se plan is nie.
Want op die ou einde van die dag is hulle ook net mense en weet net so min soos ek oor wat die groot plan is.
So Finkelstein en sy maats kan se wat hulle wil maar oor die planne by my val dit op dowe ore :P

caholt.

Lukas
10-04-2015, 08:43 AM
YouTube is n wonderlike bron van informasie maar dit is ook baie misleidend. Daar is baie, baie vals inligting en die groot meerderheid het nie die onderskryding om tussen waar en onwaar te oordeel nie.

Die probleem met n leuen is dat die n redelike hoeveelheid waarheid, of verdraaide waarheid nodig het om geloofwaardig te wees, dit maak die dinge moeilik wanneer ons met die goed gebombardeer word. Ons kan dit nie net uitvee nie en ons kan dit nie net ignoreer of afkraak nie. Ons moet altyd probeer om die waarheid te bewys en om balans daarin alles te hou.

Die mate wat ons daarin slaag, is vir my onbekend, maar ons moet deur alles aanhou met wat ons verstaan die waarheid is.

524
10-04-2015, 10:38 AM
NO MORE SECURITYNothing is permanent. Streets would be rerouted, renamed. Areas you had not seen in a while would become unfamiliar. Among other things, this would contribute to older people feeling that it was time to move on, they feel they couldn’t even keep up with the changes in areas that were once familiar. Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit. Somewhere in this same connection he mentioned that buildings and bridges would be made so that they would collapse after a while, there would be more accidents involving airplanes and railroads and automobiles. All of this to contribute to the feeling of insecurity, that nothing was safe. Not too long after this presentation, and I think one or two even before in the area where I live, we had some newly constructed bridge to break; another newly constructed bridge defect discovered before it broke, and I remember reading just scattered incidents around the country where shopping malls would fall in right where they were filled with shoppers, and I remember that one of the shopping malls in our area, the first building I’d ever been in where you could feel this vibration throughout the entire building when there were a lot of people in there, and I remember wondering at that time whether this shopping mall was one of the buildings he was talking about. Talking to construction people and architects about it they would say ‘ “Oh no, that’s good when the building vibrates like that, that means it’s flexible not rigid.” Well, maybe so, we’ll wait and see. Other areas there would be well maintained. Not every part of the city would be slums.
CRIME USED TO MANAGE SOCIETYThere would be the created slums and other areas well maintained. Those people able to leave the slums for better areas then would learn to better appreciate the importance of human accomplishment. This meant that if they left the jungle and came to civilization, so to speak, they could be proud of their own accomplishments that they made it. There was no related sympathy for those who were left behind in the jungle of drugs and deteriorating neighborhoods. Then a statement that was kind of surprising: We think we can effectively limit crime to the slum areas, so it won’t be spread heavily into better areas. I should maybe point out here that these are obviously not word for word quotations after 20 years, but where I say that I am quoting, I am giving the general drift of what was said close to word for word, perhaps not precisely so. But anyhow I remember wondering, how can he be so confident that the criminal element is going to stay where he wants it to stay? But he went on to say that increased security would be needed in the better areas. That would mean more police, better coordinated police efforts. He did not say so, but I wondered at that time about the moves that were afoot to consolidate all the police departments of suburbs around the major cities. I think the John Birch Society was one that was saying “Support your local police, don’t let them be consolidated.” and I remember wondering if that was one of the things he had in mind about security. It was not explicitly stated. But anyhow he went on to say there would be a whole new industry of residential security systems to develop with alarms and locks and alarms going into the police department so that people could protect their wealth and their well being. Because some of the criminal activity would spill out of the slums into better, more affluent looking areas that looked like they would be worth burglarizing. And again it was stated like it was a redeeming quality: See we’re generating all this more crime but look how good we are – we’re also generating the means for you to protect yourself against the crime. A sort of repeated thing throughout this presentation was the recognized evil and then the self forgiveness thing, well, see we’ve given you a way out.


http://jamesjpn.net/conspiracy/nwo-insider-dr-richard-day-reveals-nwo-plan